APPENDIX G
The criticisms of The Greek New
Testament according to the Majority Text that I have seen have almost
invariably fastened upon the genealogical[1] reconstruction of John 7:53-8:11 (among
other things). They note that sixteen
times, out of 27 (where the MSS are significantly divided, as reported in the
apparatus), the preferred reading is a minority one. Eleven of those times the
minority is less than 30%! They discover that the discussion of the variant
readings is redolent of Hort—minority readings are preferred against majority
readings on the basis of internal evidence. Such a procedure sets aside the
argument from statistical probability (which is usually associated with
Majority Text Theory). They point out the discrepancy between theory and
practice and wonder what went wrong. Can it be that when confronted with
reasonably complete collations of the extant MSS the theory just won't work? In
any event, why say the text is "according to the Majority" when it
isn't?
In the Apocalypse we are presented with a
situation where a clear majority is frequently unavailable. Where a majority
reading does not exist we are obliged to use a minority reading, and defend our
choice as best we may.[2] John 7:53-8:11 is quite different—out of
33 significant variant sets only one lacks a clear majority reading. If the
stemma offered on page xxv of the "Introduction" (H-F Majority
Text) were incontrovertible then I suppose we should all loyally accept the
consequences, but I find both the stemma and the discussion of the 21 variant
sets to be less than convincing. Since the author of the
"Introduction" recognizes that the stemmatic reconstruction (of Jn.
7:53-8:11) needs to be "searchingly evaluated", and this "calls
for the cooperation of many minds" (p. xxxii), I venture to offer the
following alternate reconstruction as my bit of "cooperation".
This article is based on a careful check of von Soden done by W.G. Pierpont (personal communication). My reconstruction of the text will be based exclusively on Soden's seven MS groups. Their relative size is as follows:
7 = a. 260 MSS, which = 29% of the total
6 = 246 MSS (216
"relatively pure" + 30 others), which = 27%
5 = a. 280 MSS,
which = 31%
4 = 29
} = 45
3 = 16 }
} = 118 MSS, which = 13%
2 = 50 }
} = 73
1 = 23
With this background I now present the 33
variant sets upon which this study is based. The total is sometimes 99% or 101%
because I used whole numbers. Groups M4,3,2,1 are frequently internally divided, and their
constituent MSS often go astray with a variety of added variants which are not
recorded on the following chart, which is why the groups do not always add up
to 100%. I use [ ] for 1-20%, ( ) for 21-95% and the whole # for 95+%.
# | vs. |
variants | M7| M6 | M5| M4 | M3 | M2 |
M1 | %
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
01| 7:53| aphlqen |
7 | 6
| - | (48%)| [6%]| [4%]|
[9%]| 57
| | aphlqon |
- | -
| - | (48%)| [12%]| [4%]|
(22%)| 2
| |
VS
| | eporeuqh
| - | - | 5 |
- | (76%)| (24%)| [4%]| 34
| | eporeuqhsan
| - | - | - |
[3%]| [6%]| (66%)| (65%)| 5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
02| 8:1 | hsouV de |
7 | -
| 5 | - | (76%)| (68%)| (65%)| 67
| | VS
| | kai o IhsouV
| - | 6 | - |
[3%]| [6%]| (26%)| (22%)| 29
| | kai IhsouV |
- | -
| - | 4 | [18%]|
- | - | 3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03| 8:2 | - - - | 7 |
- | 5 | (86%)| 3 |
(90%)| 1 | 73
| | VS
| | baqewV | - |
6 | - | [14%]| - |
[10%]| - | 28
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
04| 8:2 | paregeneto |
7 | -
| 5 | [7%] | 3 | (90%)| (70%)| 67
| | paraginetai
| - | - | - |
- | - | - |
(22%)| 1
| | VS
| | hlqen o IhsouV
| - | 6 | - |
- | - | [10%]| - |
28
| | hlqen | - |
- | - | (93%)| - | -
| - | 3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
05| 8:2 | proV auton
| 7 |
6 | - | (45%)| 3 | 2 |
(83%)| 66
| | VS
| | - - - | -
| -
| 5 | - |
- | - | [17%]| 32
| | (omit 8:2bc) | - |
- | - | (55%)| -
| - | - | 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
06| 8:3 | proV auton |
7 |(53%)| 5 | [14%]| (69%)| [16%]| (61%)| 78
| | VS
| | - - - | -
|(47%)| - | (86%)| (31%)| (84%)| (39%)| 22
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
07| 8:3 | epi
| 7 | 6 | - |
4 | 3 | 2 |
(74%)| 68
| | VS
| | en | - |
- | 5 | -
| - | - | (26%)| 32
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
08| 8:3 | kateilhmmenhn
| 7 | 6 | - |
4 | 3 | 2 |
(61%)| 68
| | VS
| | katalhfqeisan
| - | - | 5 |
- | - | - |
(30%)| 32
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
09| 8:3 | en
| 7 | - | 5 | [7%] | - | (78%)| 1 |
67
| | VS
| | en tw | -
| 6
| - | (93%)| 3 | (22%)|
- | 33
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10| 8:4 | legousin | 7
| -
| 5 | - |
- | (78%)| (91%)| 67
| | VS
| | eipon | - |
6 | - | 4
| 3 | (22%)| [9%] | 33
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11| 8:4 |
- - - | 7
| 6
| - | (93%)| 3 |
2 | (35%)| 67
| | VS
| | peirazonteV
| - | - | 5 | [7%] | - | - |
(57%)| 33
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12| 8:4 | authn | 7
| 6
| - | - |
- | - | - |
56
| | VS
| | auth h gunh
| - | - | 5 |
4 | 3 | 2
| 1 | 44
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13| 8:4 | euromen | 7
| 6
| - | - |
- | - | [13%]| 56
| | VS
| | katelhfqh
| - | - | 5 | [17%]| - | [8%] | - |
31
|
| eilhptai | - |
- | - | (76%)| 3 |
(80%)| [13%]| 9
| | kateilhptai
| - | - | - | [7%] | - | [12%]| (74%)| 3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14| 8:4 | moiceuomenhn
| 7 | 6 | - |
- | - | -
| - | 56
| | VS
| | moiceuomenh
| - | - | 5 |
4 | 3 | 2
| 1 | 44
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15| 8:5 | hmwn MwshV
| 7 | 6 | - |
- | (50%)| 2
| - | 62
| | hmin MwshV | -
| -
| - | 4 | (50%)|
- | (20%)| 5
| | MwshV | - |
- | - | -
| - | - | (23%)|
| | VS
| | MwshV hmin
| - | - | 5 |
- | - | - |
(57%)| 32
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16| 8:5 | liqoboleisqai |
7 | -
| 5 | - |
- | - | (48%)| 61
| | VS
| | liqazein | - |
6 | - | 4
| 3 | (88%)| (52%)| 38
| | liqazesqai
| - | - | - |
- | - | [12%]| -
| 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
17| 8:5 |
- - -
| 7 |(39%)| 5 | - | - |
(24%)| (48%)| 73
| | VS
| | peri authV
| - |(61%)| - | 4 |
3 | (76%)| (52%)| 27
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
18| 8:6 | ecwsi | 7
| 6
| 5 | - | (31%)| (26%)| [13%]| 90
| | VS
| | scwsi | - |
- | - | - |
(69%)| (74%)| [13%]| 5
| | ecousi | - |
- | - | 4
| - | - | -
| 3
| | eurwsi | - |
- | - | -
| - | - | (73%)|
2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19| 8:6 | kathgorian kat
| 7 | 6 | - |
4 | 3 | 2 |
(35%)| 67
|
| VS
| | kathgorein
| - | - | 5 |
- | - | - |
(65%)| 33
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
20| 8:6 | mh prospoioumenoV |
7 |(45%)| 5 | - |
- | - | (48%)| 73
| | VS
| | - - - | -
|(55%)| - | 4 |
3 | 2 | (52%)| 27
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
21| 8:7 |
erwtwnteV
| 7 | - | 5 |
4 | 3 | (62%)|
1 | 71
| | VS
| | eperwtwnteV
| - | 6 | - |
- | - | (38%)| - |
29
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22| 8:7 | anakuyaV | 7
| -
| 5 | [10%]| [12%]| (30%)| (61%)| 65
| | anekuye kai
| - | - | - | (90%)| (70%)| (66%)| [17%]| 8
| | VS
| | anableyaV
| - | 6 | - |
- | [18%]| [4%] | (22%)| 27
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23| 8:7 | proV autouV
| 7 |[4%] | 5 | - |
- | - | (39%)| 61
| | VS
| | autoiV | - |
6 | - | 4
| 3 | 2 | (61%)| 38
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24| 8:7 | DO
| IO | V |
| | t. l. | e. -h | b. | | 7
| -
| - | - |
- | - | - |
29
| | VS
| | DO
| V | IO |
| | l . | b. | e. -hn | | - | 6 |
- | -
| [19%]| - | [9%] | 27
| | VS
| | IO
| DO | V |
| | e. -hn | t. l. | b. | | - | - |
5 | -
| - | - |
- | 31
| | e. -h | t. l. | b. | | - | - | - |
- | (25%)| - |
(48%)| 2
| | e. -hn | l. | b. | | - |[4%]
| - | [3%] | - | [14%]|
- | 2
| | VS
| | IO
| V | DO |
| | e. -hn | b. | l. | | - | - | - |
4 | - | (42%)| (43%)| 7
| | e. -hn | b. | t. l. | | - | - | - |
- | - | [16%]| -
| 1
| | e. -h | b. | t. l. | | - | - | - |
- | (56%)| (28%)| -
| 2
| | - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
| | there is a clear
majority for t. l. =
65%
| | there is a clear majority for e. -hn = 68%
| | there is a clear majority
for DO in first place =56%
| | there is a clear majority
for V in last place = 64%
| | —so IO
must be in the middle. So presumably the majority reading is
|
| t.
l. e. -hn b. (a patchwork quilt!)
25| 8:9 | kai upo thV s. e. | 7
|(46%)| 5 | (21%)| - | (24%)|
- | 74
| | kai | - |
- | - | (79%)| - | -
| - | 2
| | VS
| | - - - |
- |(54%)| - | - |
3 | (76%)| 1 |
24
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26| 8:9 | ewV twn escatwn | 7
| 6
| - | 4 |
3 | (88%)| - |
62
| | VS
| | - - - | - | - | 5 |
- | - | [12%]| 1 |
38
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
27| 8:9 | monoV o IhsouV |
7 |(38%)| 5 | - |
- | (48%)| (78%)| 74
| |